Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.3-Codex

Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and GPT-5.3-Codex (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while GPT-5.3-Codex ships a 400k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, GPT-5.3-Codex leads by 11.7 pts. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.80/1M input tokens versus $1.75/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Claude Haiku 4.5 is standalone API model, while GPT-5.3-Codex is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex
Product typeStandalone API modelCoding-specialized model
Best formultimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed productioncustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window200k400k
Cheapest output$4/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Provider routes9 tracked3 tracked
Shared benchmarks1 sharedSWE-bench Verified leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when...
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $4/1M tokens.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 uniquely exposes Multimodal in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Claude Haiku 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose GPT-5.3-Codex when...
  • GPT-5.3-Codex holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 11.7 points.
  • GPT-5.3-Codex has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • GPT-5.3-Codex uniquely exposes Reasoning and Computer use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GPT-5.3-Codex for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

$1,640

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

GPT-5.3-Codex

$4,900

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $3,260. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Claude Haiku 4.5 -> GPT-5.3-Codex
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • GPT-5.3-Codex is $10/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Multimodal before moving production traffic.
  • GPT-5.3-Codex adds Reasoning and Computer use in local capability data.
GPT-5.3-Codex -> Claude Haiku 4.5
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is $10/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Computer use before moving production traffic.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 adds Multimodal in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-10-012026-02-05
Context window200k400k
Parameters——
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
OpennessProprietaryProprietary
WeightsNot releasedNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff2025-022025-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex
Input price$0.80/1M tokens$1.75/1M tokens
Output price$4/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
JSON / Tool useYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesYes
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoYes
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex
SWE-bench Verified73.385.0

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.