LLM Reference

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and Step 3.5 Flash (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and StepFun. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash ships a 256k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Step 3.5 Flash leads by 1.1 pts. On pricing, Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10/1M input tokens versus $0.80/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Step 3.5 Flash is ~700% cheaper at $0.10/1M; pay for Claude Haiku 4.5 only for coding workflow support.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalClaude Haiku 4.5Step 3.5 Flash
Best formultimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed productionreasoning-heavy apps
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, Agents, and Long context
Context window200k256k
Cheapest output$4/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Provider routes9 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks1 sharedSWE-bench Verified leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when...
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Claude Haiku 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Step 3.5 Flash when...
  • Step 3.5 Flash holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 1.1 points.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.30/1M tokens.
  • Step 3.5 Flash uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Step 3.5 Flash for Coding, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Step 3.5 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5

$1,640

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

Step 3.5 Flash

$155

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $1,485. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Claude Haiku 4.5 -> Step 3.5 Flash
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is $3.70/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
  • Step 3.5 Flash adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Step 3.5 Flash -> Claude Haiku 4.5
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is $3.70/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 adds Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-10-012026-01-29
Context window200k256k
Parameters196B (11B active)
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyMixture of Experts
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
OpennessProprietaryProprietary
WeightsNot releasedNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff2025-02-

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeClaude Haiku 4.5Step 3.5 Flash
Input price$0.80/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Output price$4/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5Step 3.5 Flash
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
JSON / Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionYesNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Step 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified73.374.4

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.