Claude Opus 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
Claude Opus 4.5 (2025) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and Xiaomi. Claude Opus 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series ships a not-yet-sourced context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series is safer overall; choose Claude Opus 4.5 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | multimodal apps |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Vision |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Opus 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude Opus 4.5 uniquely exposes Vision, Reasoning, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series for Vision.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.5
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Microsoft Foundry
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Claude Opus 4.5 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Reasoning, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series and Claude Opus 4.5; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Claude Opus 4.5 adds Vision, Reasoning, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-11-01 | 2026-04-23 |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mistral Nemotron
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.5
- DeepSeek R1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2.6
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.5
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5.1
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
Popular comparisons for Claude Opus 4.5
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.