Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series (2026) are general-purpose language models from Anthropic and Xiaomi. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series ships a not-yet-sourced context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series is safer overall; choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | multimodal apps |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Vision |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Cheapest output | $4/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 9 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 uniquely exposes Vision, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Haiku 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series for Vision.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1,640
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series and Claude Haiku 4.5; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 adds Vision, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2026-04-23 |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-02 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.80/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $4/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Nemotron
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- DeepSeek R1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemma 4 E2B
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.3-Codex
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1
Popular comparisons for Claude Haiku 4.5
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-TTS-Series
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.