Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
Claude Opus 4.6 (2026) and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Tencent AI Lab. Claude Opus 4.6 ships a 1m-token context window, while Hunyuan Hy3 Preview ships a 262k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 6.4 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is ~7476% cheaper at $0.07/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.6 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.6 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1m | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $0.26/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | SWE-bench Verified leader | 4 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.6 holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 6.4 points.
- Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Opus 4.6 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Claude Opus 4.6 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.6 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.26/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Hunyuan Hy3 Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.6
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
$118
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $10,132. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is $24.74/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.6 is $24.74/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.6 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-05 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | 1m | 262k |
| Parameters | — | 295B |
| Architecture | decoder only | dense moe hybrid |
| License | Proprietary | Tencent Hunyuan Community License |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.6 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $0.07/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $0.26/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.6 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.8 | 74.4 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 91.3 | 87.2 |
| BrowseComp | 84.0 | 67.1 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.4 | 54.4 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude Opus 4.6 at 80.8 and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview at 74.4, with Claude Opus 4.6 ahead by 6.4 points; Google-Proof Q&A has Claude Opus 4.6 at 91.3 and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview at 87.2, with Claude Opus 4.6 ahead by 4.1 points; BrowseComp has Claude Opus 4.6 at 84 and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview at 67.1, with Claude Opus 4.6 ahead by 16.9 points. The largest visible gap is 16.9 points on BrowseComp, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude Opus 4.6, multimodal input: Claude Opus 4.6, structured outputs: Claude Opus 4.6, and code execution: Claude Opus 4.6. Both models share reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.6 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Hunyuan Hy3 Preview lists $0.07/1M input and $0.26/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Hunyuan Hy3 Preview lower by about $10.88 per million blended tokens. Availability is 6 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Hunyuan Hy3 Preview when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1m tokens, while Hunyuan Hy3 Preview supports 262k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens. Hunyuan Hy3 Preview costs $0.07/1M input and $0.26/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is listed under Proprietary. Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is listed under Tencent Hunyuan Community License. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Claude Opus 4.6 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Claude Opus 4.6 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.6 and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Claude Opus 4.6 is available on Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, and OpenRouter. Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is available on OpenRouter and Tencent Cloud TI Platform. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.