Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B
Claude Opus 4.7 (2026) and Llama 4 Scout 17B (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and AI at Meta. Claude Opus 4.7 ships a 1m-token context window, while Llama 4 Scout 17B ships a 10m-token context window. On pricing, Llama 4 Scout 17B costs $0.17/1M input tokens versus $5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Llama 4 Scout 17B is ~2841% cheaper at $0.17/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.7 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Scout 17B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | multimodal apps and long-context analysis |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | RAG, Long context, and Vision |
| Context window | 1m | 10m |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $0.66/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 7 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Claude Opus 4.7 uniquely exposes Vision, Reasoning, and Function calling in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.7 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.66/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Llama 4 Scout 17B for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.7
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Llama 4 Scout 17B
$301
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Estimated monthly gap: $9,949. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B is $24.34/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Reasoning, and Function calling before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is $24.34/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.7 adds Vision, Reasoning, and Function calling in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2025-10-01 |
| Context window | 1m | 10m |
| Parameters | — | 17 |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Open Weights |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01 | 2024-08 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Scout 17B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $0.17/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $0.66/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Scout 17B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude Opus 4.7, reasoning mode: Claude Opus 4.7, function calling: Claude Opus 4.7, tool use: Claude Opus 4.7, and code execution: Claude Opus 4.7. Both models share multimodal input and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.7 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Llama 4 Scout 17B lists $0.17/1M input and $0.66/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 4 Scout 17B lower by about $10.68 per million blended tokens. Availability is 7 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Scout 17B when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Llama 4 Scout 17B supports 10m tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1m tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Llama 4 Scout 17B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout 17B costs $0.17/1M input and $0.66/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout 17B open source?
Claude Opus 4.7 is listed under Proprietary. Llama 4 Scout 17B is listed under Open Weights. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Claude Opus 4.7 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Scout 17B expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Claude Opus 4.7 is available on Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, and OpenRouter. Llama 4 Scout 17B is available on AWS Bedrock. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.