Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (2025) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Xiaomi. Claude Sonnet 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 ships a 1.05m-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads by 1.1 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 fits 5x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 200k | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $0.28/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 8 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 2 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 1.1 points.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on Google-Proof Q&A, ahead by 0.3 points.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.28/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Microsoft Foundry
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
$182
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $5,968. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 is $14.72/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $14.72/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | 200k | 1.05m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $0.14/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $0.28/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 86.0 | 84.9 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 83.4 | 83.7 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 86 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 at 84.9, with Claude Sonnet 4.5 ahead by 1.1 points; Google-Proof Q&A has Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 83.4 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 at 83.7, with Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 ahead by 0.3 points. The largest visible gap is 1.1 points on MMLU PRO, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint is close: both models cover vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $3/1M input and $15/1M output; 200,001t+ is $6/1M input and $22.50/1M output, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 lists $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 lower by about $6.42 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 8 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.05m tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $3/1M input and $15/1M output; 200,001t+ is $6/1M input and $22.50/1M output. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 lists $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 open source?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5?
Both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5?
Both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Snowflake Cortex, GCP Vertex AI, and AWS Bedrock. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 is available on OpenRouter and Xiaomi. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.