Code Cushman 002 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
Code Cushman 002 (2021) and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview (2026) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Code Cushman 002 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Hunyuan Hy3 Preview ships a 262k-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Code Cushman 002 is coding-specialized model, while Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Code Cushman 002 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents and code generation | reasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | — | 262k |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.26/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Code Cushman 002 for Coding.
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Hunyuan Hy3 Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Code Cushman 002
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
$118
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Code Cushman 002 and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Hunyuan Hy3 Preview and Code Cushman 002; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2021-11-15 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | — | 262k |
| Parameters | — | 295B |
| Architecture | decoder only | dense moe hybrid |
| License | Proprietary | Tencent Hunyuan Community License |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Code Cushman 002 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.07/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.26/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Code Cushman 002 | Hunyuan Hy3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Hunyuan Hy3 Preview, function calling: Hunyuan Hy3 Preview, and tool use: Hunyuan Hy3 Preview. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Code Cushman 002 has no token price sourced yet and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has $0.07/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 2. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Code Cushman 002 when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Hunyuan Hy3 Preview when reasoning depth and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Is Code Cushman 002 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview open source?
Code Cushman 002 is listed under Proprietary. Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is listed under Tencent Hunyuan Community License. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for reasoning mode, Code Cushman 002 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Code Cushman 002 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for tool use, Code Cushman 002 or Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Hunyuan Hy3 Preview has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Code Cushman 002 and Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Code Cushman 002 is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is available on OpenRouter and Tencent Cloud TI Platform. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Code Cushman 002 over Hunyuan Hy3 Preview?
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Code Cushman 002 is coding-specialized model, while Hunyuan Hy3 Preview is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive. If your workload also depends on coding workflow support, start with Code Cushman 002; if it depends on reasoning depth, run the same evaluation with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.