LLM Reference

Codex 1 vs Magistral Small 2506

Codex 1 (2025) and Magistral Small 2506 (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Codex 1 ships a 192k-token context window, while Magistral Small 2506 ships a 128k-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Codex 1 is coding-specialized model, while Magistral Small 2506 is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalCodex 1Magistral Small 2506
Product typeCoding-specialized modelStandalone API model
Best forcustom coding agents and code generationreasoning-heavy apps
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and Long contextLong context
Context window192k128k
Cheapest output--
Provider routes0 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Codex 1 when...
  • Codex 1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Codex 1 uniquely exposes Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Codex 1 for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Choose Magistral Small 2506 when...
  • Magistral Small 2506 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Magistral Small 2506 for Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Codex 1

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Magistral Small 2506

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Codex 1 -> Magistral Small 2506
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Codex 1 and Magistral Small 2506; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Code execution before moving production traffic.
Magistral Small 2506 -> Codex 1
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Magistral Small 2506 and Codex 1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Codex 1 adds Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-05-162025-06-10
Context window192k128k
Parameters24B
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0OSI-approved
OpennessProprietaryOpen source
WeightsNot releasedUnknown
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff-2025-06

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeCodex 1Magistral Small 2506
Input price--
Output price--
Providers-

Pricing not yet sourced for either model.

Capabilities

CapabilityCodex 1Magistral Small 2506
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
JSON / Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsNoNo
Code executionYesNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.