LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Codex 1 vs Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct

Codex 1 (2025) and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct (2025) are agentic coding models from OpenAI and MistralAI. Codex 1 ships a 192K-token context window, while Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct ships a 128K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is safer overall; choose Codex 1 when coding workflow support matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalCodex 1Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and Long contextRAG, Agents, and Long context
Context window192K128K
Cheapest output-$1.5/1M tokens
Provider routes0 tracked3 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Codex 1 when...
  • Codex 1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Codex 1 uniquely exposes Reasoning and Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Codex 1 for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when...
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct for RAG, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Codex 1

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct

$775

Cheapest tracked route: AWS Bedrock

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Codex 1 -> Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Codex 1 and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Code execution before moving production traffic.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct -> Codex 1
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Codex 1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • Codex 1 adds Reasoning and Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-05-162025-12-01
Context window192K128K
Parameters675B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietary1
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeCodex 1Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
Input price-$0.5/1M tokens
Output price-$1.5/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityCodex 1Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionYesNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Codex 1, structured outputs: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct, and code execution: Codex 1. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Codex 1 has no token price sourced yet and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has $0.5/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 3. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Codex 1 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Codex 1 or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Codex 1 supports 192K tokens, while Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Codex 1 or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct open source?

Codex 1 is listed under Proprietary. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is listed under 1. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Codex 1 or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Codex 1 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for structured outputs, Codex 1 or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for code execution, Codex 1 or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Codex 1 has the clearer documented code execution signal in this comparison. If code execution is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Codex 1 and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Codex 1 is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM, and Mistral AI Studio. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.