Codex Mini Latest vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Codex Mini Latest (2025) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (2026) are agentic coding models from OpenAI and Xiaomi. Codex Mini Latest ships a 200k-token context window, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships a 1.05m-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro fits 5x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Codex Mini Latest for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Codex Mini Latest | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | custom coding agents and code generation | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | Coding and Long context | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Codex Mini Latest for Coding and Long context.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Codex Mini Latest
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$566
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Codex Mini Latest and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro adds JSON / JSON / Tool use and Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Codex Mini Latest; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / JSON / Tool use and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-05-16 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | 200k | 1.05m |
| Parameters | — | 1T |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Codex Mini Latest | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.43/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Codex Mini Latest | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- GLM-5.1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Codex Mini Latest vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
- GLM-5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Opus 4.6 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Mythos Preview vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Popular comparisons for Codex Mini Latest
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.