LLM Reference

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-5.2

DeepSeek V3 0324 (2025) and GPT-5.2 (2025) are frontier reasoning models from DeepSeek and OpenAI. DeepSeek V3 0324 ships a 160k-token context window, while GPT-5.2 ships a 400k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, GPT-5.2 leads by 3.2 pts. On pricing, DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27/1M input tokens versus $1.75/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

DeepSeek V3 0324 is ~548% cheaper at $0.27/1M; pay for GPT-5.2 only for coding workflow support.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-5.2
Best forprovider-routed productionreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and Long contextCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window160k400k
Cheapest output$1.12/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Provider routes3 tracked3 tracked
Shared benchmarks1 rowsSWE-bench Verified leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when...
  • DeepSeek V3 0324 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.12/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V3 0324 for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Choose GPT-5.2 when...
  • GPT-5.2 holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 3.2 points.
  • GPT-5.2 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • GPT-5.2 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GPT-5.2 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324

$496

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Novita AI

GPT-5.2

$4,900

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Replicate API

Estimated monthly gap: $4,404. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

DeepSeek V3 0324 -> GPT-5.2
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-5.2; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • GPT-5.2 is $12.88/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • GPT-5.2 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
GPT-5.2 -> DeepSeek V3 0324
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-5.2 and DeepSeek V3 0324; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • DeepSeek V3 0324 is $12.88/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-03-242025-12-11
Context window160k400k
Parameters671B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseMIT(OSI)Proprietary
OpennessOpen sourceProprietary
Commercial useCommercial use allowedCommercial use with conditions
Knowledge cutoff-2025-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-5.2
Input price$0.27/1M tokens$1.75/1M tokens
Output price$1.12/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-5.2
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoYes
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-5.2
SWE-bench Verified76.880.0

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has DeepSeek V3 0324 at 76.8 and GPT-5.2 at 80, with GPT-5.2 ahead by 3.2 points. The largest visible gap is 3.2 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: GPT-5.2, multimodal input: GPT-5.2, reasoning mode: GPT-5.2, function calling: GPT-5.2, tool use: GPT-5.2, structured outputs: GPT-5.2, and code execution: GPT-5.2. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, DeepSeek V3 0324 lists $0.27/1M input and $1.12/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while GPT-5.2 lists $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts DeepSeek V3 0324 lower by about $4.90 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when provider fit and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose GPT-5.2 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 supports 400k tokens, while DeepSeek V3 0324 supports 160k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-5.2?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27/1M input and $1.12/1M output tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-5.2 open source?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is listed under MIT. GPT-5.2 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

Which is better for multimodal input, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-5.2?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is available on Fireworks AI, Microsoft Foundry, and Novita AI. GPT-5.2 is available on Replicate API, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.