LLM Reference

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8

DeepSeek V3 0324 (2025) and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 (2025) are general-purpose language models from DeepSeek and AI at Meta. DeepSeek V3 0324 ships a 160k-token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 ships a 1m-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, DeepSeek V3 0324 leads by 20.5 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is ~80% cheaper at $0.15/1M; pay for DeepSeek V3 0324 only for provider fit.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalDeepSeek V3 0324Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
Best forprovider-routed productionmultimodal apps, long-context analysis, and provider-routed production
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and Long contextCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window160k1m
Cheapest output$1.12/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Provider routes3 tracked10 tracked
Shared benchmarksGoogle-Proof Q&A leader3 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when...
  • DeepSeek V3 0324 holds a shared-benchmark lead on Google-Proof Q&A, ahead by 20.5 points.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V3 0324 for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 when...
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.60/1M tokens.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8

DeepSeek V3 0324

$496

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Novita AI

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8

$270

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $226. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

DeepSeek V3 0324 -> Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
  • Provider overlap exists on Microsoft Foundry, Fireworks AI, and Novita AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is $0.52/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 -> DeepSeek V3 0324
  • Provider overlap exists on Fireworks AI, Microsoft Foundry, and Novita AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • DeepSeek V3 0324 is $0.52/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-03-242025-04-05
Context window160k1m
Parameters671B400B (17B active)
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyMixture of Experts
LicenseMITOSI-approvedLlama 4 Community
OpennessOpen sourceOpen weights
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff-2024-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeDeepSeek V3 0324Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
Input price$0.27/1M tokens$0.15/1M tokens
Output price$1.12/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
Google-Proof Q&A87.667.1
HumanEval85.577.4
Aider Polyglot55.115.6

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, Google-Proof Q&A has DeepSeek V3 0324 at 87.6 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 at 67.1, with DeepSeek V3 0324 ahead by 20.5 points; HumanEval has DeepSeek V3 0324 at 85.5 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 at 77.4, with DeepSeek V3 0324 ahead by 8.1 points; Aider Polyglot has DeepSeek V3 0324 at 55.1 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 at 15.6, with DeepSeek V3 0324 ahead by 39.5 points. The largest visible gap is 39.5 points on Aider Polyglot, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8, multimodal input: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8, and structured outputs: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, DeepSeek V3 0324 lists $0.27/1M input and $1.12/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 lists $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 lower by about $0.24 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 10, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 supports 1m tokens, while DeepSeek V3 0324 supports 160k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27/1M input and $1.12/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 open source?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is listed under MIT. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is listed under Llama 4 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run DeepSeek V3 0324 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is available on Fireworks AI, Microsoft Foundry, and Novita AI. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Together AI, OpenRouter, Fireworks AI, and DeepInfra. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.