LLM Reference

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8

DeepSeek V4 Flash (2026) and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 (2025) are frontier reasoning models from DeepSeek and AI at Meta. DeepSeek V4 Flash ships a 1m-token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 ships a 1m-token context window. On MMLU PRO, DeepSeek V4 Flash leads by 5.7 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

DeepSeek V4 Flash is ~53% cheaper at $0.10/1M; pay for Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 only for vision-heavy evaluation.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysismultimodal apps, long-context analysis, and provider-routed production
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window1m1m
Cheapest output$0.20/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Provider routes5 tracked10 tracked
Shared benchmarksMMLU PRO leader4 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash when...
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 5.7 points.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.20/1M tokens.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V4 Flash for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 when...
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 holds a shared-benchmark lead on HumanEval, ahead by 7.9 points.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash

$128

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8

$270

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $142. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

DeepSeek V4 Flash -> Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
  • Provider overlap exists on Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is $0.40/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 -> DeepSeek V4 Flash
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.40/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-04-242025-04-05
Context window1m1m
Parameters284B400B (17B active)
Architecturemixture of expertsmixture of experts
LicenseMIT(OSI)Llama 4 Community
OpennessOpen sourceOpen weights
Commercial useCommercial use allowedCommercial use with conditions
Knowledge cutoff-2024-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
Input price$0.10/1M tokens$0.15/1M tokens
Output price$0.20/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingYesNo
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8
MMLU PRO86.280.5
Google-Proof Q&A88.167.1
LiveCodeBench91.643.4
HumanEval69.577.4

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has DeepSeek V4 Flash at 86.2 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 at 80.5, with DeepSeek V4 Flash ahead by 5.7 points; Google-Proof Q&A has DeepSeek V4 Flash at 88.1 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 at 67.1, with DeepSeek V4 Flash ahead by 21 points; LiveCodeBench has DeepSeek V4 Flash at 91.6 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 at 43.4, with DeepSeek V4 Flash ahead by 48.2 points. The largest visible gap is 48.2 points on LiveCodeBench, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8, multimodal input: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8, reasoning mode: DeepSeek V4 Flash, function calling: DeepSeek V4 Flash, and tool use: DeepSeek V4 Flash. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash lists $0.10/1M input and $0.20/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 lists $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts DeepSeek V4 Flash lower by about $0.16 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 10, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash when reasoning depth and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1m tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 supports 1m tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on tracked token pricing. DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.20/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 open source?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is listed under MIT. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is listed under Llama 4 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is available on DeepSeek Platform, OpenRouter, Microsoft Foundry, Vercel AI Gateway, and Novita AI. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct FP8 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Together AI, OpenRouter, Fireworks AI, and DeepInfra. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.