Doubao vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Doubao (2023) and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) are compact production models from ByteDance and NVIDIA AI. Doubao ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is safer overall; choose Doubao when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Doubao | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | Long context |
| Context window | — | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Doubao when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Doubao
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Doubao and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Doubao; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-08-31 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | — | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 49B |
| Architecture | - | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | NVIDIA Open Model |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Doubao | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Doubao | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Popular comparisons for Doubao
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Last reviewed: 2026-09-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.