LLM Reference

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs GPT-5.5 Instant

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (2026) and GPT-5.5 Instant (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ships a 131k-token context window, while GPT-5.5 Instant ships a 400k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is ~900% cheaper at $0.50/1M; pay for GPT-5.5 Instant only for coding workflow support.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)GPT-5.5 Instant
Best forreasoning-heavy apps and multimodal appsmultimodal apps and tool-calling agents
Decision fitLong context and VisionCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window131k400k
Cheapest output$60/1M tokens$30/1M tokens
Provider routes1 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when...
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for Long context and Vision.
Choose GPT-5.5 Instant when...
  • GPT-5.5 Instant has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • GPT-5.5 Instant has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $30/1M tokens.
  • GPT-5.5 Instant uniquely exposes Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GPT-5.5 Instant for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate GPT-5.5 Instant

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$15,400

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio

GPT-5.5 Instant

$11,500

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API

Estimated monthly gap: $3,900. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) -> GPT-5.5 Instant
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and GPT-5.5 Instant; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • GPT-5.5 Instant is $30/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
  • GPT-5.5 Instant adds Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
GPT-5.5 Instant -> Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-5.5 Instant and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image); plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is $30/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) adds Reasoning in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-05-282026-05-05
Context window131k400k
Parameters
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Knowledge cutoff2025-012025-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)GPT-5.5 Instant
Input price$0.50/1M tokens$5/1M tokens
Output price$60/1M tokens$30/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)GPT-5.5 Instant
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoYes
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), function calling: GPT-5.5 Instant, tool use: GPT-5.5 Instant, structured outputs: GPT-5.5 Instant, and code execution: GPT-5.5 Instant. Both models share vision and multimodal input, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) lists $0.50/1M input and $60/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while GPT-5.5 Instant lists $5/1M input and $30/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GPT-5.5 Instant lower by about $5.85 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when reasoning depth and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose GPT-5.5 Instant when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or GPT-5.5 Instant?

GPT-5.5 Instant supports 400k tokens, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) supports 131k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or GPT-5.5 Instant?

GPT-5.5 Instant is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50/1M input and $60/1M output tokens. GPT-5.5 Instant costs $5/1M input and $30/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or GPT-5.5 Instant open source?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is listed under Proprietary. GPT-5.5 Instant is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or GPT-5.5 Instant?

Both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and GPT-5.5 Instant expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Which is better for multimodal input, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or GPT-5.5 Instant?

Both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and GPT-5.5 Instant expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and GPT-5.5 Instant?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is available on Google AI Studio. GPT-5.5 Instant is available on OpenAI API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-31. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.