LLM Reference

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Grok 4.3

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (2026) and Grok 4.3 (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and xAI. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ships a 131k-token context window, while Grok 4.3 ships a 1m-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Grok 4.3 fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for tighter calls.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Grok 4.3
Best forreasoning-heavy apps and multimodal appsreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents
Decision fitLong context and VisionRAG, Agents, and Long context
Context window131k1m
Cheapest output$60/1M tokens$2.50/1M tokens
Provider routes1 tracked4 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when...
  • Local decision data tags Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for Long context and Vision.
Choose Grok 4.3 when...
  • Grok 4.3 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Grok 4.3 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2.50/1M tokens.
  • Grok 4.3 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Grok 4.3 uniquely exposes Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Grok 4.3 for RAG, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Grok 4.3

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$15,400

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio

Grok 4.3

$1,625

Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console

Estimated monthly gap: $13,775. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) -> Grok 4.3
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Grok 4.3; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Grok 4.3 is $57.50/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Grok 4.3 adds Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Grok 4.3 -> Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok 4.3 and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image); plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is $57.50/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-05-282026-05-06
Context window131k1m
Parameters~0.5T
Architecturedecoder only-
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Knowledge cutoff2025-012024-11

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Grok 4.3
Input price$0.50/1M tokens
0-200,001t
$1.25/1M tokens
200,001t+
$2.50/1M tokens
Output price$60/1M tokens
0-200,001t
$2.50/1M tokens
200,001t+
$5/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Grok 4.3
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on function calling: Grok 4.3, tool use: Grok 4.3, and structured outputs: Grok 4.3. Both models share vision, multimodal input, and reasoning mode, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) lists $0.50/1M input and $60/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Grok 4.3 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1.25/1M input and $2.50/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2.50/1M input and $5/1M output. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Grok 4.3 lower by about $16.73 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 1 providers versus 4, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when vision-heavy evaluation and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Grok 4.3 when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 supports 1m tokens, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) supports 131k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Grok 4.3?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) lists $0.50/1M input and $60/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Grok 4.3 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1.25/1M input and $2.50/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2.50/1M input and $5/1M output. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Grok 4.3 open source?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is listed under Proprietary. Grok 4.3 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Grok 4.3?

Both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Grok 4.3 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Which is better for multimodal input, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Grok 4.3?

Both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Grok 4.3 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Grok 4.3?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is available on Google AI Studio. Grok 4.3 is available on xAI Console, OpenRouter, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-31. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.