Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (2026) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ships a 131k-token context window, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships a 1.05m-token context window. On pricing, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/1M input tokens versus $0.50/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is standalone API model, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Standalone API model | Coding-specialized model |
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps and multimodal apps | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | Long context and Vision | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 131k | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | $60/1M tokens | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for Long context and Vision.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.87/1M tokens.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro uniquely exposes Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
$15,400
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$566
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $14,835. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is $59.13/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro adds Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image); plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is $59.13/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-28 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | 131k | 1.05m |
| Parameters | — | 1T |
| Architecture | decoder only | mixture of experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.50/1M tokens | $0.43/1M tokens |
| Output price | $60/1M tokens | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), multimodal input: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), reasoning mode: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), function calling: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro, tool use: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro, and structured outputs: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) lists $0.50/1M input and $60/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists $0.43/1M input and $0.87/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro lower by about $17.78 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when reasoning depth are central to the workload. Choose Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.05m tokens, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) supports 131k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50/1M input and $60/1M output tokens. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/1M input and $0.87/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro open source?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is listed under Proprietary. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is available on Google AI Studio. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available on OpenRouter, Xiaomi, and Novita AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-31. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.