LLM Reference

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Grok Build 0.1

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (2026) and Grok Build 0.1 (2026) are agentic coding models from Google DeepMind and xAI. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview ships a 1M-token context window, while Grok Build 0.1 ships a 256K-token context window. On pricing, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25/1M input tokens versus $1/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is ~300% cheaper at $0.25/1M; pay for Grok Build 0.1 only for coding workflow support.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGrok Build 0.1
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window1M256K
Cheapest output$1.5/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Provider routes3 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when...
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.5/1M tokens.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when...
  • Grok Build 0.1 uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Grok Build 0.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Lower estimate Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

$575

Cheapest tracked route: Google AI Studio

Grok Build 0.1

$1,300

Cheapest tracked route: xAI Console

Estimated monthly gap: $725. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview -> Grok Build 0.1
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Grok Build 0.1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is $0.5/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution before moving production traffic.
  • Grok Build 0.1 adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Grok Build 0.1 -> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok Build 0.1 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is $0.5/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview adds Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-03-032026-05-14
Context window1M256K
Parameters
Architecturedecoder only-
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGrok Build 0.1
Input price$0.25/1M tokens$1/1M tokens
Output price$1.5/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGrok Build 0.1
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Function callingYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, multimodal input: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, reasoning mode: Grok Build 0.1, and code execution: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Both models share function calling, tool use, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview lists $0.25/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens, while Grok Build 0.1 lists $1/1M input and $2/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview lower by about $0.67 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview supports 1M tokens, while Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens. Grok Build 0.1 costs $1/1M input and $2/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Grok Build 0.1 open source?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is listed under Proprietary. Grok Build 0.1 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is available on Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex AI, and OpenRouter. Grok Build 0.1 is available on xAI Console. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-20. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.