LLM Reference

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.2 Codex

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (2026) and GPT-5.2 Codex (2025) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ships a 1.05m-token context window, while GPT-5.2 Codex ships a 400k-token context window. On pricing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25/1M input tokens versus $1.75/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is standalone API model, while GPT-5.2 Codex is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5.2 Codex
Product typeStandalone API modelCoding-specialized model
Best formultimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysiscustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window1.05m400k
Cheapest output$1.50/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Provider routes3 tracked2 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when...
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.50/1M tokens.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose GPT-5.2 Codex when...
  • GPT-5.2 Codex uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GPT-5.2 Codex for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

$575

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio

GPT-5.2 Codex

$4,900

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Vercel AI Gateway

Estimated monthly gap: $4,325. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite -> GPT-5.2 Codex
  • Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex is $12.50/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex adds Reasoning in local capability data.
GPT-5.2 Codex -> Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
  • Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is $12.50/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-05-072025-12-18
Context window1.05m400k
Parameters
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
OpennessProprietaryProprietary
WeightsNot releasedNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff2025-012025-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5.2 Codex
Input price$0.25/1M tokens$1.75/1M tokens
Output price$1.50/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5.2 Codex
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
JSON / Tool useYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesYes
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-30. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.