Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Llama 4 Scout 17B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools (2026) and Llama 4 Scout 17B (2025) are general-purpose language models from Google DeepMind and AI at Meta. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools ships a 1M-token context window, while Llama 4 Scout 17B ships a 10M-token context window. On pricing, Llama 4 Scout 17B costs $0.17/1M input tokens versus $2/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Llama 4 Scout 17B is ~1076% cheaper at $0.17/1M; pay for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools only for provider fit.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Llama 4 Scout 17B |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | RAG, Long context, and Classification | RAG, Long context, and Vision |
| Context window | 1M | 10M |
| Cheapest output | $12/1M tokens | $0.66/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools for RAG, Long context, and Classification.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.66/1M tokens.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B uniquely exposes Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Llama 4 Scout 17B for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
$4,600
Cheapest tracked route: OpenRouter
Llama 4 Scout 17B
$301
Cheapest tracked route: AWS Bedrock
Estimated monthly gap: $4,299. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and Llama 4 Scout 17B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B is $11.34/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B adds Multimodal in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 4 Scout 17B and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is $11.34/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Multimodal before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-01-01 | 2025-10-01 |
| Context window | 1M | 10M |
| Parameters | — | 17 |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Unknown | Open Source |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2024-08 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Llama 4 Scout 17B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/1M tokens | $0.17/1M tokens |
| Output price | $12/1M tokens | $0.66/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Llama 4 Scout 17B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Llama 4 Scout 17B. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools lists $2/1M input and $12/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout 17B lists $0.17/1M input and $0.66/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 4 Scout 17B lower by about $4.68 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Scout 17B when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Llama 4 Scout 17B supports 10M tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports 1M tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Llama 4 Scout 17B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools costs $2/1M input and $12/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout 17B costs $0.17/1M input and $0.66/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Llama 4 Scout 17B open source?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is listed under Unknown. Llama 4 Scout 17B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Llama 4 Scout 17B has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for structured outputs, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and Llama 4 Scout 17B expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and Llama 4 Scout 17B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is available on OpenRouter. Llama 4 Scout 17B is available on AWS Bedrock. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.