LLM Reference

GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.5

GLM-5.1 (2026) and Kimi K2.5 (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. GLM-5.1 ships a 200k-token context window, while Kimi K2.5 ships a 256k-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, Kimi K2.5 leads by 1.7 pts. On pricing, Kimi K2.5 costs $0.44/1M input tokens versus $1.05/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: GLM-5.1 is standalone API model, while Kimi K2.5 is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5
Product typeStandalone API modelCoding-specialized model
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed productioncustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window200k256k
Cheapest output$3.50/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Provider routes5 tracked10 tracked
Shared benchmarks6 sharedGoogle-Proof Q&A leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose GLM-5.1 when...
  • GLM-5.1 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MCP-Atlas, ahead by 42.3 points.
  • GLM-5.1 uniquely exposes Reasoning and Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GLM-5.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Kimi K2.5 when...
  • Kimi K2.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on Google-Proof Q&A, ahead by 1.7 points.
  • Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Kimi K2.5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2/1M tokens.
  • Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Kimi K2.5 uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Kimi K2.5

GLM-5.1

$1,715

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Kimi K2.5

$852

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $863. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

GLM-5.1 -> Kimi K2.5
  • Provider overlap exists on Fireworks AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Kimi K2.5 is $1.50/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Code execution before moving production traffic.
  • Kimi K2.5 adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
Kimi K2.5 -> GLM-5.1
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, Fireworks AI, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • GLM-5.1 is $1.50/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
  • GLM-5.1 adds Reasoning and Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-04-072026-03-15
Context window200k256k
Parameters754B total, 40B active1T (MoE, 384 experts)
ArchitectureMixture of ExpertsMixture of Experts
LicenseMITOSI-approvedProprietary
OpennessOpen sourceProprietary
WeightsAvailableNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff2025-11-

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5
Input price$1.05/1M tokens$0.44/1M tokens
Output price$3.50/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
JSON / Tool useYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5
Google-Proof Q&A86.287.9
AIME 202595.396.1
Humanity's Last Exam31.050.2
MCP-Atlas71.829.5
Terminal-Bench 2.063.550.8
SWE-rebench62.758.5

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-30. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.