Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.5 (2026) and Kimi K2.6 (2026) are agentic coding models from Moonshot AI. Kimi K2.5 ships a 256k-token context window, while Kimi K2.6 ships a 262k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Kimi K2.5 leads by 2.5 pts. On pricing, Kimi K2.5 costs $0.44/1M input tokens versus $0.73/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Kimi K2.5 is ~66% cheaper at $0.44/1M; pay for Kimi K2.6 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Kimi K2.5 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 256k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $2/1M tokens | $3.49/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 10 tracked | 8 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 9 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Kimi K2.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 2.5 points.
- Kimi K2.5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2/1M tokens.
- Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Kimi K2.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Kimi K2.6 holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 3.4 points.
- Kimi K2.6 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Kimi K2.6 uniquely exposes Reasoning and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Kimi K2.6 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Kimi K2.5
$852
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Kimi K2.6
$1,457
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $605. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Cloudflare Workers AI, NVIDIA NIM, and Fireworks AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Kimi K2.6 is $1.49/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Kimi K2.6 adds Reasoning and Tool use in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on Cloudflare Workers AI, Fireworks AI, and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Kimi K2.5 is $1.49/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-03-15 | 2026-04-20 |
| Context window | 256k | 262k |
| Parameters | 1T (MoE, 384 experts) | 1T |
| Architecture | mixture of experts | Mixture of Experts (MoE) |
| License | Proprietary | MIT(OSI) |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use allowed |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2025-04 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Kimi K2.5 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.44/1M tokens | $0.73/1M tokens |
| Output price | $2/1M tokens | $3.49/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Kimi K2.5 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 87.1 | 84.6 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.8 | 80.2 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 87.9 | 90.5 |
| LiveCodeBench | 85.0 | 89.6 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 50.2 | 34.7 |
| MCP-Atlas | 29.5 | 55.9 |
| BrowseComp | 60.6 | 83.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 50.8 | 66.7 |
| MMMU Pro | 78.5 | 80.1 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has Kimi K2.5 at 87.1 and Kimi K2.6 at 84.6, with Kimi K2.5 ahead by 2.5 points; SWE-bench Verified has Kimi K2.5 at 76.8 and Kimi K2.6 at 80.2, with Kimi K2.6 ahead by 3.4 points; Google-Proof Q&A has Kimi K2.5 at 87.9 and Kimi K2.6 at 90.5, with Kimi K2.6 ahead by 2.6 points. The largest visible gap is 3.4 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Kimi K2.6 and tool use: Kimi K2.6. Both models share vision, multimodal input, function calling, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Kimi K2.5 lists $0.44/1M input and $2/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Kimi K2.6 lists $0.73/1M input and $3.49/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Kimi K2.5 lower by about $0.65 per million blended tokens. Availability is 10 providers versus 8, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Kimi K2.5 when coding workflow support, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Kimi K2.6 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 supports 262k tokens, while Kimi K2.5 supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.5 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.44/1M input and $2/1M output tokens. Kimi K2.6 costs $0.73/1M input and $3.49/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2.6 open source?
Kimi K2.5 is listed under Proprietary. Kimi K2.6 is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2.6?
Both Kimi K2.5 and Kimi K2.6 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2.6?
Both Kimi K2.5 and Kimi K2.6 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run Kimi K2.5 and Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.5 is available on Cloudflare Workers AI, Fireworks AI, OpenRouter, Together AI, and NVIDIA NIM. Kimi K2.6 is available on Cloudflare Workers AI, NVIDIA NIM, Moonshot AI Kimi, Fireworks AI, and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-04. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.