GLM-5 vs Grok-3
GLM-5 (2026) and Grok-3 (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Zhipu AI and xAI. GLM-5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Grok-3 ships a 131k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, GLM-5 leads by 6.1 pts. On pricing, GLM-5 costs $0.60/1M input tokens versus $0.80/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
GLM-5 is safer overall; choose Grok-3 when vision-heavy evaluation matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GLM-5 | Grok-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 131k |
| Cheapest output | $2.08/1M tokens | $2.40/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 7 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 4 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- GLM-5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 6.1 points.
- GLM-5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GLM-5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2.08/1M tokens.
- GLM-5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags GLM-5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Grok-3 holds a shared-benchmark lead on AIME 2025, ahead by 0.6 points.
- Grok-3 uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Grok-3 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
GLM-5
$1,000
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Grok-3
$1,240
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Chutes AI
Estimated monthly gap: $240. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Grok-3 is $0.32/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Grok-3 adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GLM-5 is $0.32/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-11 | 2025-02-17 |
| Context window | 200k | 131k |
| Parameters | 744B total, 40B active | — |
| Architecture | Mixture of Experts | - |
| License | MITOSI-approved | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open source | Proprietary |
| Weights | Available | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-11 | 2025-04 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GLM-5 | Grok-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.60/1M tokens | $0.80/1M tokens |
| Output price | $2.08/1M tokens | $2.40/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | GLM-5 | Grok-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Grok-3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 86.0 | 79.9 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 86.0 | 84.6 |
| AIME 2025 | 92.7 | 93.3 |
| LiveCodeBench | 81.9 | 79.4 |
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for GLM-5
Popular comparisons for Grok-3
Last reviewed: 2026-07-10. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.