GPT-4o (08-06) vs GPT-5
GPT-4o (08-06) (2024) and GPT-5 (2025) are frontier reasoning models from OpenAI. GPT-4o (08-06) ships a 128K-token context window, while GPT-5 ships a 400K-token context window. On Aider Polyglot, GPT-5 leads by 64.9 pts. On pricing, GPT-5 costs $1.25/1M input tokens versus $2.5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
GPT-5 is ~100% cheaper at $1.25/1M; pay for GPT-4o (08-06) only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GPT-4o (08-06) | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 128K | 400K |
| Cheapest output | $10/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 1 rows | Aider Polyglot leader |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags GPT-4o (08-06) for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GPT-5 leads the largest shared benchmark signal on Aider Polyglot by 64.9 points.
- GPT-5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GPT-5 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GPT-5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
GPT-4o (08-06)
$4,500
Cheapest tracked route: OpenAI API
GPT-5
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route: Replicate API
Estimated monthly gap: $1,000. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and OpenAI API; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Cheapest tracked output pricing is tied, so migration risk shifts to quality, latency, and provider packaging.
- GPT-5 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenAI API and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Cheapest tracked output pricing is tied, so migration risk shifts to quality, latency, and provider packaging.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-08-06 | 2025-08-07 |
| Context window | 128K | 400K |
| Parameters | 1.76T (8x222B MoE)* | — |
| Architecture | mixture of experts | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-10 | 2024-09 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GPT-4o (08-06) | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2.5/1M tokens | $1.25/1M tokens |
| Output price | $10/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o (08-06) | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (08-06) | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 23.1 | 88.0 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, Aider Polyglot has GPT-4o (08-06) at 23.1 and GPT-5 at 88, with GPT-5 ahead by 64.9 points. The largest visible gap is 64.9 points on Aider Polyglot, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: GPT-5, function calling: GPT-5, and tool use: GPT-5. Both models share vision, multimodal input, structured outputs, and code execution, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, GPT-4o (08-06) lists $2.5/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while GPT-5 lists $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GPT-5 lower by about $0.88 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose GPT-4o (08-06) when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose GPT-5 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4o (08-06) or GPT-5?
GPT-5 supports 400K tokens, while GPT-4o (08-06) supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (08-06) or GPT-5?
GPT-5 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. GPT-4o (08-06) costs $2.5/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. GPT-5 costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is GPT-4o (08-06) or GPT-5 open source?
GPT-4o (08-06) is listed under Proprietary. GPT-5 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, GPT-4o (08-06) or GPT-5?
Both GPT-4o (08-06) and GPT-5 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, GPT-4o (08-06) or GPT-5?
Both GPT-4o (08-06) and GPT-5 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run GPT-4o (08-06) and GPT-5?
GPT-4o (08-06) is available on OpenAI API, Salesforce Einstein Generative AI, and OpenRouter. GPT-5 is available on Replicate API, OpenRouter, and OpenAI API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.