Granite 3.1 8B Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Granite 3.1 8B Instruct (2024) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from IBM Research and Stockmark. Granite 3.1 8B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is safer overall; choose Granite 3.1 8B Instruct when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Granite 3.1 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Granite 3.1 8B Instruct for Long context.
- Stockmark 2 100B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Granite 3.1 8B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Granite 3.1 8B Instruct and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct and Granite 3.1 8B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | 8B | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Open Weights |
| Openness | Open source | Open weights |
| Weights | Available | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | - |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Granite 3.1 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Granite 3.1 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Granite 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Granite 3.1 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.