Granite Guardian 3.0 8B vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
Granite Guardian 3.0 8B (2025) and Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety (2025) are compact production models from IBM Research and NVIDIA AI. Granite Guardian 3.0 8B ships a 8k-token context window, while Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Granite Guardian 3.0 8B is safer overall; choose Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Granite Guardian 3.0 8B | Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Classification | Classification |
| Context window | 8k | 4k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Granite Guardian 3.0 8B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Granite Guardian 3.0 8B for Classification.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety for Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Granite Guardian 3.0 8B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-01-01 |
| Context window | 8k | 4k |
| Parameters | 8B | 8B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Open Weights |
| Openness | Open source | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | - |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Granite Guardian 3.0 8B | Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Granite Guardian 3.0 8B | Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Granite Guardian 3.0 8B vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control
- Granite Guardian 3.0 8B vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs text-curie
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Granite Guardian 3.0 8B
- Granite Guardian 3.0 8B vs Llama Guard 7B
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
Popular comparisons for Granite Guardian 3.0 8B
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs text-curie
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama Guard 2 8B
Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.