Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Mistral Medium 3
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 (2025) and Mistral Medium 3 (2025) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and MistralAI. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 ships a 4K-token context window, while Mistral Medium 3 ships a 128K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Mistral Medium 3 fits 32x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Vision | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 4K | 128K |
| Cheapest output | - | $2/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 5 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 for Vision.
- Mistral Medium 3 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Mistral Medium 3 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Mistral Medium 3 uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use, Structured outputs, and Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Medium 3 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Mistral Medium 3
$820
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Mistral AI Studio
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Mistral Medium 3 adds JSON / Tool use, Structured outputs, and Code execution in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use, Structured outputs, and Code execution before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-05-01 |
| Context window | 4K | 128K |
| Parameters | 8B | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Llama 3 Community | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open weights | Proprietary |
| Weights | Unknown | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Restricted | Restricted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2025-03 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $2/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on JSON / Tool use: Mistral Medium 3, JSON / Tool use: Mistral Medium 3, structured outputs: Mistral Medium 3, and code execution: Mistral Medium 3. Both models share vision and multimodal input, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 has no token price sourced yet and Mistral Medium 3 has $0.40/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 1 tracked routes versus 5. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 when vision-heavy evaluation are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Medium 3 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Mistral Medium 3 supports 128K tokens, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 supports 4K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 or Mistral Medium 3 open source?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 is listed under Llama 3 Community. Mistral Medium 3 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Both Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 and Mistral Medium 3 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Both Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 and Mistral Medium 3 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for JSON / Tool use, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Mistral Medium 3 has the clearer documented JSON / Tool use signal in this comparison. If JSON / Tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 and Mistral Medium 3?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 is available on NVIDIA NIM. Mistral Medium 3 is available on NVIDIA NIM, Mistral AI Studio, Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, and GCP Vertex AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Codex 1 vs Mistral Medium 3
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Llama 2 7B
- GPT-1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
- Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3
- Mistral Magistral Small 2509 vs Mistral Medium 3
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Llama 2 7B
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs GPT-1
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1 vs Marin 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Mistral Medium 3
Last reviewed: 2026-10-18. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.