Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) and Seed-OSS 36B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and ByteDance. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window, while Seed-OSS 36B Instruct ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 fits 32x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Seed-OSS 36B Instruct for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context | General |
| Context window | 128k | 4k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
- Use Seed-OSS 36B Instruct when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-06-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 4k |
| Parameters | 49B | 36B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | NVIDIA Open Model | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open weights | Proprietary |
| Weights | Unknown | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2024-10 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Popular comparisons for Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-07-10. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.