Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and Stockmark. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is safer overall; choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-06-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | 49B | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | NVIDIA Open Model | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Open weights | Open source |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Popular comparisons for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-09-08. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.