Llama 3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
Llama 3 70B Instruct (2024) and Mistral Medium 3 Instruct (2025) are compact production models from AI at Meta and MistralAI. Llama 3 70B Instruct ships a 8K-token context window, while Mistral Medium 3 Instruct ships a 128K-token context window. On pricing, Llama 3 70B Instruct costs $0.4/1M input tokens versus $0.4/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct fits 16x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3 70B Instruct for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3 70B Instruct | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use | Long context |
| Context window | 8K | 128K |
| Cheapest output | $0.4/1M tokens | $2/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 17 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Llama 3 70B Instruct has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.4/1M tokens.
- Llama 3 70B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Llama 3 70B Instruct uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3 70B Instruct for Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Medium 3 Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Llama 3 70B Instruct
$420
Cheapest tracked route: Hyperbolic AI Inference
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
$820
Cheapest tracked route: Mistral AI Studio
Estimated monthly gap: $400. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is $1.6/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Llama 3 70B Instruct is $1.6/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Llama 3 70B Instruct adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-04-18 | 2025-10-01 |
| Context window | 8K | 128K |
| Parameters | 70B | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Open Source | 1 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-12 | 2025-03 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3 70B Instruct | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/1M tokens | $0.4/1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/1M tokens | $2/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3 70B Instruct | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on structured outputs: Llama 3 70B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Llama 3 70B Instruct lists $0.4/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens, while Mistral Medium 3 Instruct lists $0.4/1M input and $2/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 3 70B Instruct lower by about $0.48 per million blended tokens. Availability is 17 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Llama 3 70B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Medium 3 Instruct when long-context analysis and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3 Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct supports 128K tokens, while Llama 3 70B Instruct supports 8K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3 Instruct?
Llama 3 70B Instruct is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Llama 3 70B Instruct costs $0.4/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens. Mistral Medium 3 Instruct costs $0.4/1M input and $2/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Llama 3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3 Instruct open source?
Llama 3 70B Instruct is listed under Open Source. Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is listed under 1. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for structured outputs, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3 Instruct?
Llama 3 70B Instruct has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Llama 3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3 Instruct?
Llama 3 70B Instruct is available on GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry, NVIDIA NIM, and DeepInfra. Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM and Mistral AI Studio. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Llama 3 70B Instruct over Mistral Medium 3 Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct fits 16x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3 70B Instruct for tighter calls. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Llama 3 70B Instruct; if it depends on long-context analysis, run the same evaluation with Mistral Medium 3 Instruct.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.