MiniCPM-V 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4
MiniCPM-V 4.6 (2026) and Mistral Small 4 (2026) are general-purpose language models from OpenBMB and MistralAI. MiniCPM-V 4.6 ships a 262k-token context window, while Mistral Small 4 ships a 256k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
MiniCPM-V 4.6 is safer overall; choose Mistral Small 4 when vision-heavy evaluation matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | MiniCPM-V 4.6 | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and tool-calling agents | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 262k | 256k |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- MiniCPM-V 4.6 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags MiniCPM-V 4.6 for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- Mistral Small 4 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Small 4 for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
MiniCPM-V 4.6
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Mistral Small 4
$155
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Mistral AI Studio
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for MiniCPM-V 4.6 and Mistral Small 4; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Small 4 and MiniCPM-V 4.6; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-11 | 2026-03-16 |
| Context window | 262k | 256k |
| Parameters | 1.3B | 119B (6.5B active) |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Open source | Open source |
| Weights | Available | Available |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2025-06 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | MiniCPM-V 4.6 | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | MiniCPM-V 4.6 | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- MiniCPM-V 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.6 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.6 vs Mistral Large 2
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.6 vs Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
- Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct vs Mistral Small 4
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Mistral Small 4
- Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct vs Mistral Small 4
Popular comparisons for MiniCPM-V 4.6
Popular comparisons for Mistral Small 4
Last reviewed: 2026-07-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.