LLM Reference

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct (2025) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (2024) are compact production models from MistralAI and NVIDIA AI. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Nemotron 3 Ultra ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is safer overall; choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when provider fit matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalMistral Large 3 675B InstructNemotron 3 Ultra
Best forprovider-routed productiongeneral production evaluation
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsLong context
Context window128k128k
Cheapest output$1.50/1M tokens-
Provider routes5 tracked0 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when...
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when...
  • Local decision data tags Nemotron 3 Ultra for Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct

$775

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct -> Nemotron 3 Ultra
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Ultra; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Nemotron 3 Ultra -> Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct adds Structured outputs in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-12-012024-09-10
Context window128k128k
Parameters675B550B (55B active)
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
License1Proprietary
Knowledge cutoff2024-11-

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeMistral Large 3 675B InstructNemotron 3 Ultra
Input price$0.50/1M tokens-
Output price$1.50/1M tokens-
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Large 3 675B InstructNemotron 3 Ultra
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on structured outputs: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has $0.50/1M input tokens and Nemotron 3 Ultra has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 5 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct supports 128k tokens, while Nemotron 3 Ultra supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Ultra open source?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is listed under 1. Nemotron 3 Ultra is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for structured outputs, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM, Mistral AI Studio, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway. Nemotron 3 Ultra is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

When should I pick Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct over Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is safer overall; choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when provider fit matters. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.