Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3
Mistral Medium 3 (2025) and Mistral Small 3 (2025) are compact production models from MistralAI. Mistral Medium 3 ships a 128K-token context window, while Mistral Small 3 ships a 33K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.
Mistral Medium 3 is safer overall; choose Mistral Small 3 when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Mistral Medium 3 | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and tool-calling agents | tool-calling agents and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use |
| Context window | 128K | 33K |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Mistral Medium 3 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Mistral Medium 3 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Medium 3 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Mistral Small 3 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Small 3 for Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Mistral Medium 3
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Mistral Small 3
$155
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Together AI
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Medium 3 and Mistral Small 3; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Small 3 and Mistral Medium 3; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Mistral Medium 3 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-05-01 | 2025-01-01 |
| Context window | 128K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | 24B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-03 | 2023-10 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Mistral Medium 3 | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Mistral Medium 3, multimodal input: Mistral Medium 3, and code execution: Mistral Medium 3. Both models share function calling, tool use, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Mistral Medium 3 has no token price sourced yet and Mistral Small 3 has $0.10/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 2. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Mistral Medium 3 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Small 3 when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Medium 3 supports 128K tokens, while Mistral Small 3 supports 33K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3 open source?
Mistral Medium 3 is listed under Proprietary. Mistral Small 3 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Medium 3 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Medium 3 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3?
Both Mistral Medium 3 and Mistral Small 3 expose function calling. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Mistral Medium 3 and Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Medium 3 is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Mistral Small 3 is available on Together AI and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.