Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-27B (2026) and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (2026) are agentic coding models from Alibaba. Qwen3.6-27B ships a 262k-token context window, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B ships a 262k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Qwen3.6-27B leads by 1 pts. On pricing, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B costs $0.15/1M input tokens versus $0.32/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is ~113% cheaper at $0.15/1M; pay for Qwen3.6-27B only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 262k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $3.20/1M tokens | $1/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 4 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 7 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Qwen3.6-27B holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 1 points.
- Qwen3.6-27B has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Qwen3.6-27B uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Qwen3.6-27B for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Qwen3.6-35B-A3B for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Qwen3.6-27B
$1,056
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
$370
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $686. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Novita AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is $2.20/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Novita AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Qwen3.6-27B is $2.20/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Qwen3.6-27B adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-27 | 2026-04-16 |
| Context window | 262k | 262k |
| Parameters | 27B | 35B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Open source | Open source |
| Weights | Available | Available |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.32/1M tokens | $0.15/1M tokens |
| Output price | $3.20/1M tokens | $1/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 86.2 | 85.2 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.2 | 73.4 |
| SWE-bench Pro | 53.5 | 49.5 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 87.8 | 86.0 |
| LiveCodeBench | 83.9 | 80.4 |
| AIME 2026 | 94.1 | 92.7 |
| MMMU Pro | 75.8 | 75.3 |
Continue comparing
- Code Davinci 001 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3-Max vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-27B
Popular comparisons for Qwen3.6-27B
Popular comparisons for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.