MathVista
Mathematical reasoning benchmark combining visual contexts (charts, geometry diagrams, scientific figures) from 28 existing datasets with 6,141 total problems.
Models ranked
5
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
86.8 – 74.8
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
-11.20
Apr 16 → Jun 7 · 2 models
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).
Notes: DAT-5571 vision ranking audit: llm-stats reports o3 leads MathVista at 86.8%.
Notes: DAT-5571 vision ranking audit: llm-stats reports o4-mini at 84.3% on MathVista.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Last reviewed: Apr 15, 2026