Aquila 2 34B vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Aquila 2 34B (2023) and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Aquila 2 34B ships a 2k-token context window, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships a 1.05m-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Aquila 2 34B is standalone API model, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Aquila 2 34B | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Standalone API model | Coding-specialized model |
| Best for | general production evaluation | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | General | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 2k | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Aquila 2 34B when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Aquila 2 34B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$566
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Aquila 2 34B and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro adds JSON / Tool use and Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Aquila 2 34B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | 2k | 1.05m |
| Parameters | 34B | 1T |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Aquila 2 34B | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.43/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Aquila 2 34B | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- GLM-5.1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Codex Mini Latest vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- GLM-5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Opus 4.6 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Mythos Preview vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Popular comparisons for Aquila 2 34B
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.