LLM Reference

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview

Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024) and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and Google DeepMind. Claude 3.5 Haiku ships a 200k-token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview ships a 1.05m-token context window. On pricing, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input tokens versus $1.25/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is ~56% cheaper at $0.80/1M; pay for Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview only for long-context analysis.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and provider-routed productionmultimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysis
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsRAG, Agents, and Long context
Context window200k1.05m
Cheapest output$4/1M tokens$10/1M tokens
Provider routes6 tracked2 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when...
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $4/1M tokens.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku uniquely exposes Reasoning and Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Claude 3.5 Haiku for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview when...
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview uniquely exposes Multimodal and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview for RAG, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku

$1,640

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview

$3,500

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio

Estimated monthly gap: $1,860. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Claude 3.5 Haiku -> Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
  • Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is $6/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Code execution before moving production traffic.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview adds Multimodal and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview -> Claude 3.5 Haiku
  • Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku is $6/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Multimodal and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku adds Reasoning and Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2024-10-222025-10-01
Context window200k1.05m
Parameters——
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
OpennessProprietaryProprietary
WeightsNot releasedNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff-2025-01

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
Input price$0.80/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output price$4/1M tokens$10/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
VisionYesYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
JSON / Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.