Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Code Davinci 001
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and Code Davinci 001 (2021) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Code Davinci 001 ships a not-yet-sourced context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Claude Haiku 4.5 is standalone API model, while Code Davinci 001 is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Code Davinci 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Standalone API model | Coding-specialized model |
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | custom coding agents and code generation |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Cheapest output | $4/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 9 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Haiku 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags Code Davinci 001 for Coding.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1,640
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Code Davinci 001
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Code Davinci 001; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Code Davinci 001 and Claude Haiku 4.5; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 adds Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2021-07-01 |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-02 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Code Davinci 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.80/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $4/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Code Davinci 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Claude Haiku 4.5
Popular comparisons for Code Davinci 001
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.