Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Large 2 (2407)
Claude Opus 4.6 (2026) and Mistral Large 2 (2407) (2024) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and MistralAI. Claude Opus 4.6 ships a 1M-token context window, while Mistral Large 2 (2407) ships a 128K-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 23.2 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Mistral Large 2 (2407) is ~900% cheaper at $0.50/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.6 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.6 | Mistral Large 2 (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | tool-calling agents and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $1.50/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 7 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 4 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.6 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 23.2 points.
- Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Opus 4.6 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.6 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Mistral Large 2 (2407) has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.50/1M tokens.
- Mistral Large 2 (2407) has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Large 2 (2407) for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.6
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Mistral Large 2 (2407)
$775
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Chutes AI
Estimated monthly gap: $9,475. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, and AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Mistral Large 2 (2407) is $23.50/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on AWS Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry, and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.6 is $23.50/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.6 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-05 | 2024-07-24 |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Parameters | — | 123B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Mistral License |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Weights | Not released | Available |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Restricted | Not permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | 2024-03 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.6 | Mistral Large 2 (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $0.50/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $1.50/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.6 | Mistral Large 2 (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Mistral Large 2 (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 89.1 | 65.9 |
| HumanEval | 95.0 | 92.0 |
| Chatbot Arena | 1501.0 | 1266.0 |
| Massive Multitask Language Understanding | 91.1 | 84.0 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has Claude Opus 4.6 at 89.1 and Mistral Large 2 (2407) at 65.9, with Claude Opus 4.6 ahead by 23.2 points; HumanEval has Claude Opus 4.6 at 95 and Mistral Large 2 (2407) at 92, with Claude Opus 4.6 ahead by 3 points; Chatbot Arena has Claude Opus 4.6 at 1501 and Mistral Large 2 (2407) at 1266, with Claude Opus 4.6 ahead by 235 points. The largest visible gap is 235 points on Chatbot Arena, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude Opus 4.6, multimodal input: Claude Opus 4.6, reasoning mode: Claude Opus 4.6, JSON / Tool use: Claude Opus 4.6, and code execution: Claude Opus 4.6. Both models share JSON / Tool use and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.6 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Mistral Large 2 (2407) lists $0.50/1M input and $1.50/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Mistral Large 2 (2407) lower by about $10.20 per million blended tokens. Availability is 6 providers versus 7, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Large 2 (2407) when provider fit, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 2 (2407)?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M tokens, while Mistral Large 2 (2407) supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 2 (2407)?
Mistral Large 2 (2407) is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens. Mistral Large 2 (2407) costs $0.50/1M input and $1.50/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 2 (2407) open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is listed under Proprietary. Mistral Large 2 (2407) is listed under Mistral License. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 2 (2407)?
Claude Opus 4.6 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 2 (2407)?
Claude Opus 4.6 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.6 and Mistral Large 2 (2407)?
Claude Opus 4.6 is available on Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, and OpenRouter. Mistral Large 2 (2407) is available on Microsoft Foundry, IBM watsonx, OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, and Chutes AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Claude Opus 4.6
Popular comparisons for Mistral Large 2 (2407)
Last reviewed: 2026-10-17. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.