Code Davinci 001 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Code Davinci 001 (2021) and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Code Davinci 001 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ships a 1m-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Code Davinci 001 is coding-specialized model, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Code Davinci 001 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents and code generation | multimodal apps and long-context analysis |
| Decision fit | Coding | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | — | 1m |
| Cheapest output | - | $10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Code Davinci 001 for Coding.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Code Davinci 001
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Code Davinci 001 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Code Davinci 001; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2021-07-01 | 2025-03-25 |
| Context window | — | 1m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Code Davinci 001 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $1.25/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $10/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Code Davinci 001 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Code Davinci 001 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API
- Code Davinci 001 vs Mistral Nemotron
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs GPT-5.5
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Grok Build 0.1
- Code Davinci 001 vs Llama 2 13B Chat
- Code Davinci 001 vs GPT-5.4
- Code Davinci 001 vs GPT-5.5
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Grok 4
- Code Davinci 001 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
Popular comparisons for Code Davinci 001
Popular comparisons for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.