Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Grok 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (2025) and Grok 4 (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and xAI. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ships a 1M-token context window, while Grok 4 ships a 256k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads by 13.9 pts. On pricing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is ~140% cheaper at $1.25/1M; pay for Grok 4 only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Released | 2025-03-25 | 2026-03-01 |
| Context window | 1M | 256k |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Unknown | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/1M tokens | $3/1M tokens |
| Output price | $10/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 90.6 | 76.7 |
| Aider Polyglot | 79.1 | 79.6 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 at 90.6 and Grok 4 at 76.7, with Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ahead by 13.9 points; Aider Polyglot has Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 at 79.1 and Grok 4 at 79.6, with Grok 4 ahead by 0.5 points. The largest visible gap is 13.9 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Grok 4 and reasoning mode: Grok 4. Both models share structured outputs and code execution, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 lists $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while Grok 4 lists $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 lower by about $2.72 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Grok 4 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Grok 4?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1M tokens, while Grok 4 supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Grok 4?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. Grok 4 costs $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Grok 4 open source?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is listed under Unknown. Grok 4 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for reasoning mode, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Grok 4?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available on OpenRouter. Grok 4 is available on Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, and Replicate API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.