Codex Mini Latest vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Codex Mini Latest (2025) and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Codex Mini Latest ships a 200k-token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Codex Mini Latest is coding-specialized model, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Codex Mini Latest | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents and code generation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Coding and Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Codex Mini Latest has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Codex Mini Latest for Coding and Long context.
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Codex Mini Latest
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Codex Mini Latest and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Codex Mini Latest; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-05-16 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 49B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | NVIDIA Open Model |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Codex Mini Latest | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Codex Mini Latest | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Codex Mini Latest
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Last reviewed: 2026-09-18. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.