DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
DeepSeek R1 0528 (2025) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (2025) are frontier reasoning models from DeepSeek and Google DeepMind. DeepSeek R1 0528 ships a 130k-token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Flash ships a 1m-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Gemini 2.5 Flash leads by 3.4 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is ~67% cheaper at $0.30/1M; pay for DeepSeek R1 0528 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps and provider-routed production | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysis |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 130k | 1m |
| Cheapest output | $2.15/1M tokens | $2.50/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 7 tracked | 6 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 4 shared | MMLU PRO leader |
Decision tradeoffs
- DeepSeek R1 0528 holds a shared-benchmark lead on Aider Polyglot, ahead by 16.3 points.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2.15/1M tokens.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags DeepSeek R1 0528 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 3.4 points.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Flash for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
DeepSeek R1 0528
$938
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$865
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio
Estimated monthly gap: $72.50. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is $0.35/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash adds Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 is $0.35/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-05-28 | 2025-06-17 |
| Context window | 130k | 1m |
| Parameters | 685B total, 37B active (MoE) | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | MITOSI-approved | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open source | Proprietary |
| Weights | Unknown | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2025-01 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.50/1M tokens | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Output price | $2.15/1M tokens | $2.50/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 85.0 | 88.4 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 81.0 | 82.8 |
| LiveCodeBench | 73.3 | 76.2 |
| Aider Polyglot | 71.4 | 55.1 |
Continue comparing
- DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Mistral Nemotron
- DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok 4
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok 4.3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Popular comparisons for DeepSeek R1 0528
Popular comparisons for Gemini 2.5 Flash
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.