DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-5 9B
DeepSeek R1 (2025) and GLM-5 9B (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from DeepSeek and Zhipu AI. DeepSeek R1 ships a 128k-token context window, while GLM-5 9B ships a 262k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
GLM-5 9B is safer overall; choose DeepSeek R1 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps and provider-routed production | reasoning-heavy apps and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $0.30/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 14 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- DeepSeek R1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- DeepSeek R1 uniquely exposes Structured outputs and Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags DeepSeek R1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GLM-5 9B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GLM-5 9B uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GLM-5 9B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
DeepSeek R1
$155
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Bitdeer AI
GLM-5 9B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for DeepSeek R1 and GLM-5 9B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs and Code execution before moving production traffic.
- GLM-5 9B adds JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GLM-5 9B and DeepSeek R1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- DeepSeek R1 adds Structured outputs and Code execution in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-02-15 |
| Context window | 128k | 262k |
| Parameters | 671B, 37B Active | 9 |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | MITOSI-approved | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Open source | Open source |
| Weights | Available | Available |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-12 | 2025-11 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.10/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $0.30/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for DeepSeek R1
Popular comparisons for GLM-5 9B
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.