LLM Reference

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Kimi K2.5

DeepSeek V3.1 (2025) and Kimi K2.5 (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. DeepSeek V3.1 ships a 64k-token context window, while Kimi K2.5 ships a 256k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Kimi K2.5 leads by 3.8 pts. On pricing, DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.27/1M input tokens versus $0.44/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: DeepSeek V3.1 is standalone API model, while Kimi K2.5 is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalDeepSeek V3.1Kimi K2.5
Product typeStandalone API modelCoding-specialized model
Best formultimodal apps and provider-routed productioncustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and VisionCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window64k256k
Cheapest output$1/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Provider routes8 tracked10 tracked
Shared benchmarks2 sharedMMLU PRO leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 when...
  • DeepSeek V3.1 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1/1M tokens.
  • DeepSeek V3.1 uniquely exposes Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V3.1 for Coding, Agents, and Vision.
Choose Kimi K2.5 when...
  • Kimi K2.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 3.8 points.
  • Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Kimi K2.5 uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Kimi K2.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate DeepSeek V3.1

DeepSeek V3.1

$466

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Novita AI

Kimi K2.5

$852

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $386. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

DeepSeek V3.1 -> Kimi K2.5
  • Provider overlap exists on Fireworks AI, Together AI, and NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Kimi K2.5 is $1/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Code execution before moving production traffic.
  • Kimi K2.5 adds JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Kimi K2.5 -> DeepSeek V3.1
  • Provider overlap exists on Microsoft Foundry, Fireworks AI, and NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • DeepSeek V3.1 is $1/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
  • DeepSeek V3.1 adds Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-08-212026-03-15
Context window64k256k
Parameters671B total, 37B active (MoE)1T (MoE, 384 experts)
ArchitectureMixture of ExpertsMixture of Experts
LicenseMITOSI-approvedProprietary
OpennessOpen sourceProprietary
WeightsUnknownNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeDeepSeek V3.1Kimi K2.5
Input price$0.27/1M tokens$0.44/1M tokens
Output price$1/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3.1Kimi K2.5
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
JSON / Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Kimi K2.5
MMLU PRO83.387.1
SWE-bench Verified66.076.8

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.