LLM Reference

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B

DeepSeek V4 Flash (2026) and Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B (2026) are frontier reasoning models from DeepSeek and Microsoft Research. DeepSeek V4 Flash ships a 1m-token context window, while Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B ships a not-yet-sourced context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.

DeepSeek V4 Flash is safer overall; choose Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B when vision-heavy evaluation matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalDeepSeek V4 FlashPhi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysismultimodal apps
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsVision
Context window1m
Cheapest output$0.12/1M tokens-
Provider routes5 tracked0 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash when...
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash uniquely exposes Reasoning, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V4 Flash for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B when...
  • Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B for Vision.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

DeepSeek V4 Flash

$76.26

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

DeepSeek V4 Flash -> Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for DeepSeek V4 Flash and Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B -> DeepSeek V4 Flash
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B and DeepSeek V4 Flash; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash adds Reasoning, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-04-242026-03-12
Context window1m
Parameters284B15B
ArchitectureMixture of Experts-
LicenseMITOSI-approvedMITOSI-approved
OpennessOpen sourceOpen source
WeightsAvailableUnknown
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff-2025-03

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeDeepSeek V4 FlashPhi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B
Input price
Off-peak
$0.22/1M tokens
All UTC hours outside DeepSeek's peak windows. Cache-hit input: $0.007 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.22 per 1M; output: $0.66 per 1M.
Peak
$0.44/1M tokens
01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC. Cache-hit input: $0.014 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.44 per 1M; output: $1.32 per 1M.
-
Output price
Off-peak
$0.66/1M tokens
All UTC hours outside DeepSeek's peak windows. Cache-hit input: $0.007 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.22 per 1M; output: $0.66 per 1M.
Peak
$1.32/1M tokens
01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC. Cache-hit input: $0.014 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.44 per 1M; output: $1.32 per 1M.
-
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V4 FlashPhi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
JSON / Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-07-03. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.