LLM Reference

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.2 Codex

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (2026) and GPT-5.2 Codex (2025) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ships a 1m-token context window, while GPT-5.2 Codex ships a 400k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by 7.8 pts. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is standalone API model, while GPT-5.2 Codex is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.2 Codex
Product typeStandalone API modelCoding-specialized model
Best formultimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysiscustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window1m400k
Cheapest output$12/1M tokens$14/1M tokens
Provider routes5 tracked2 tracked
Shared benchmarksSWE-bench Verified leader2 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when...
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 7.8 points.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $12/1M tokens.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose GPT-5.2 Codex when...
  • GPT-5.2 Codex holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Pro, ahead by 2.2 points.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GPT-5.2 Codex for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

$4,600

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio

GPT-5.2 Codex

$4,900

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Vercel AI Gateway

Estimated monthly gap: $300. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview -> GPT-5.2 Codex
  • Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex is $2/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex adds Reasoning in local capability data.
GPT-5.2 Codex -> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $2/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-02-192025-12-18
Context window1m400k
Parameters
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
OpennessProprietaryProprietary
WeightsNot releasedNot released
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff2025-012025-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.2 Codex
Input price
0-200,001t
$2/1M tokens
200,001t+
$4/1M tokens
$1.75/1M tokens
Output price
0-200,001t
$12/1M tokens
200,001t+
$18/1M tokens
$14/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.2 Codex
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
JSON / Tool useYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesYes
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.2 Codex
SWE-bench Verified80.672.8
SWE-bench Pro54.256.4

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-30. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.