Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B (2026) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B ships a 8K-token context window, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships a 1M-token context window. On pricing, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B costs $0.02/1M input tokens versus $0.43/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is standalone API model, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Standalone API model | Coding-specialized model |
| Best for | tool-calling agents | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Cheapest output | $0.04/1M tokens | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.04/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B for Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags MiMo-V2.5-Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
$26.00
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Together AI
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$566
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $540. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is $0.83/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is $0.83/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-03-15 | 2026-04-22 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Parameters | 4B | 1T |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Gemma | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open weights | Proprietary |
| Weights | Unknown | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Restricted | Restricted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.02/1M tokens | $0.43/1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.04/1M tokens | $0.87/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint is close: both models cover JSON / Tool use, and structured outputs. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B lists $0.02/1M input and $0.04/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists $0.43/1M input and $0.87/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B lower by about $0.54 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B when provider fit and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1M tokens, while Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B supports 8K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B costs $0.02/1M input and $0.04/1M output tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/1M input and $0.87/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro open source?
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is listed under Gemma. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for JSON / Tool use, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Both Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro expose JSON / Tool use. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for JSON / Tool use, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Both Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro expose JSON / Tool use. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is available on Together AI. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available on OpenRouter, Xiaomi, and Novita AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Granite Guardian 3.0 8B
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Mistral 7B v0.1
Popular comparisons for MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Last reviewed: 2026-10-20. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.