GPT-4 vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
GPT-4 (2023) and Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from OpenAI and Tokyo Institute of Technology. GPT-4 ships a 8k-token context window, while Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct is safer overall; choose GPT-4 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GPT-4 | Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Coding, Agents, and Vision | General |
| Context window | 8k | 4k |
| Cheapest output | $60/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 4 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- GPT-4 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GPT-4 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- GPT-4 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GPT-4 for Coding, Agents, and Vision.
- Use Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
GPT-4
$39,000
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API
Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-4 and Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct and GPT-4; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- GPT-4 adds Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-03-14 | 2025-01-01 |
| Context window | 8k | 4k |
| Parameters | 1.76T (8x222B MoE)* | 8B |
| Architecture | Mixture of Experts | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Llama 2 Community |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2021-09 | 2023 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GPT-4 | Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $30/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $60/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4 | Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- GPT-4 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
- GPT-4 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- GPT-4 vs GPT-2
- Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for GPT-4
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-30. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.